Suits Seek More Than $1 Billion for Sweatshop Abuses
Three lawsuits together will seek more than $1 billion dollars for horrendous human rights abuses suffered by garment workers in Saipan.
Two of the suits were class action suits filed in Los Angeles and the U.S. territory of Saipan. Saipan is a 13-mile-long island in the Northern Marianas where plaintiffs charge that hundreds of thousands of Asian workers were lured with promised of good pay, and then beaten, threatened, and forced to work for little pay in unsafe and inhumane working conditions. Plaintiffs' attorney Al Meyerhoff has called Saipan "American's worst sweatshop."
Most sweatshop workers are young women from China, the Philippines, Bangladesh and Thailand. Plaintiffs allege that factory managers regularly confiscate their workers' passports, detain them at the factory compound and limit their social activities, force them to work up to 12 hour days, 7 days a week, and threaten and beat workers who cannot meet factory quotas. Workers are forced to work and live in crowded, unsafe environments, are often surrounded by brutal guards, and are frequently malnourished.
Plaintiffs allege that 32 Saipan factories owned mostly by Chinese, Japanese, and Korean subcontractors produce clothing that bears the "Made in the U.S.A." label. Eighteen companies were named in the lawsuit, and another 22 companies have been charged with withholding overtime pay and subjecting its employees to intolerable living and working conditions.
A third lawsuit was filed by human rights groups Global Exchange, Sweatshop Watch, Asian Law Caucus, and the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees in a San Francisco state court.
Together, the lawsuits seek over $1 billion in corporate profits, damages and unpaid wages. Lead plaintiffs' attorney William S. Lerach offered an apt summary of the abuses, saying, "On an island where thousands of American soldiers died during World War II, thousands of young Asian women are forced to endure slavery so that ... corporate profits can be higher."
Media Resources: AP and Washington Post - January 13 and 14, 1999
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .