Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

May-25-99

Supreme Court: Schools Liable for Sexual Harassment Among Students

The United States Supreme Court yesterday ruled that schools may be held liable for failing to protect students from the sexual harassment of another in certain circumstances, overturning several lower court rulings, which argued that Title IX did not apply to peer harassment. The vote was 5-4, with Justices Kennedy, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas dissenting.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor authored the majority opinion, which stated that schools may be held liable for failing to protect a student from sexual harassment in certain circumstances. Schools would be held liable only in instances where school administrators have shown "deliberate indifference" and failed to take reasonable action to stop the harassment. In addition, the alleged harassment must be judged "so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it denies its victims the equal access to education" guaranteed under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

"Consider, for example, a case in which male students physically threaten their female peers every day, successfully preventing the female students from using a particular school resource, an athletic field or a computer lab, for instance," read the Court's majority opinion. "District administrators are well aware of the daily ritual, yet they deliberately ignore requests for aid from the female students wishing to use the resource. The district's knowing refusal to take any action in response to such behavior would fly in the face of Title IX's core principles, and such deliberate indifference may appropriately be subject to claims for monetary damages."

The case in question was brought before the Supreme Court by Aurelia Davis, mother of LaShonda Davis of Monroe County, Georgia. LaShonda has alleged that one of her classmates, known as G.F., repeated taunted her with sexual suggestions and unwanted sexual touching for months on end. Despite numerous complaints to several teachers and to her principal, LaShonda and her mother, Aurelia, both contend that G.F. was never punished.

Media Resources: New York Times - May 25, 1999


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

4/18/2014 Texas Hospitals Revoke Admitting Privileges to Abortion Providers - Reproductive health access in Texas continues to vanish in the wake of HB 2, the omnibus anti-abortion bill that, among other things, requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges in order to keep their clinics open. . . .
 
4/18/2014 Dartmouth President Calls For Changes In Wake of Federal Sexual Assault Investigation - Dartmouth College President Phil Hanlon gave a powerful speech Wednesday night calling for significant changes on campus in light of its high rates of sexual assault, high-risk drinking, and discriminatory social scene. "Darmouth's promise is being hijacked by high-risk and harmful behaviors, behaviors that are hurting too many of our students, dividing us as a community and distracting from our important work of teaching and learning," Hanlon said. . . .
 
4/17/2014 Federal Court Permanently Blocks North Dakota's Extreme 6-Week Abortion Ban - A federal district court permanently blocked one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the nation yesterday, calling it "invalid and unconstitutional." The North Dakota law, HB 1456, directly challenged Roe v. . . .