Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

October-15-13

CA Bans Employment Discrimination Against Domestic Violence Victims

California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill into law on Friday that will ban employment discrimination against victims of domestic violence, stalking, and sexual assault, effective January 1.

The law, SB 400, would prohibit an employer from firing or "in any manner discriminating or retaliating against an employee because of the employee's status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking." The law entitles victims to reasonable safety accommodations and procedures in the workplace, like changing a work phone number or implementing a safety plan.

The bill was introduced after teacher Carie Charlesworth was fired when her abusive husband came to her school's parking lot and the school had to go into lockdown.

Economic constraints often contribute to a victim's decision to stay in abusive relationships, so helping them keep their jobs will allow some victims to leave the relationships sooner. "I commend the Governor for signing this bill, which protects victims from job loss and discrimination at a time when they most need support and a steady paycheck," said the bill's author, State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), in a statement. "Victims will no longer fear losing their livelihoods and being re-victimized in the workplace because of the actions of their abusers."

Only six other states and Puerto Rico have discrimination protections for victims, and only thirteen mandate that victims can take leave without getting fired to seek medical attention, recover from injuries, obtain legal assistance or counseling, or access other forms of assistance related to their abuse. A federal law providing these protections was introduced in March by Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-California).

Media Resources: California Legislative Information 10/11/13; ThinkProgress 10/15/13; Feminist Newswire 6/14/13; Legal Aid Society Employment Center 10/11/13; Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson's Press Releases 10/11/13; United States Legislative Information


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/20/2014 North Carolina Board of Elections Eliminates On-Campus Voting Sites Across the State - North Carolina will begin state-wide early voting on Thursday, and unlike the 2012 presidential election, many students across the state will have no polling place on-campus, making it more difficult for students to exercise their right to vote. The North Carolina State Board of Elections recently eliminated the only on-campus voting location for the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, a campus with more than 20,000 students. . . .
 
10/20/2014 Jay Leno Receives Mark Twain Prize, Salutes Mavis and Her Work for Women's Rights - Former long-time host of "The Tonight Show" Jay Leno saluted his wife, Mavis, for her work on behalf of women's rights around the world when he was awarded the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor this weekend at The Kennedy Center in Washington, DC. The Mark Twain prize is awarded for comedic achievement, and the event, where Leno performed a monologue and paid tribute to the many comedians he has worked with throughout his career, brought together supporters of the The John F. . . .
 
10/20/2014 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Slams Supreme Court for Upholding Voter Suppression in Texas - Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a blistering dissent after a ruling by the US Supreme Court this weekend threatened to disqualify more than half a million Texas voters from early voting. In an unsigned order Saturday, a majority of the Supreme Court sided with a Texas law requiring voters to produce specific forms of photo identification in order to cast a ballot in the 2014 election. . . .