Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

April-21-99

Feminist Majority Foundation Supports Amendment to Enforce Clinic Protection Laws

The Feminist Majority Foundation is in full support of S.625, Senator Schumer's proposed amendment to Section 523(a) of title 11, United States Code. This amendment will ensure that individuals who violate FACE and RICO be held responsible for their actions.

Ensuring that any judgment or monetary settlement resulting from clinic violence is non-dischargeable is vital to enforcing clinic protection laws to their fullest potential. Far too often, individuals who commit violence against women's health clinics attempt to evade financial responsibility for those actions. Even after a court or a jury has assessed liability and financial damages for the violence committed, these anti-choice individuals attempt to use the bankruptcy laws as a shield for their illegal behavior. This amendment will ensure that individuals who are adjudged liable for clinic violence cannot discharge those judgments in bankruptcy.

"Clinics and pro-choice groups, going to court at their own expense have won tens of millions of dollars in damages against anti-abortion extremists," said Sonya Proctor, Director of Law Enforcement Operations of the Feminist Majority Foundation's National Clinic Access Project, and former Interim Chief of Police of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department. "Yet precious little of these damages have actually been collected by seriously aggrieved women's health clinics and victims of anti-abortion extremists. These domestic terrorists are flaunting the law and we need more effective laws to bring them to justice. Senator Schumer's proposed amendment will help close one major loop-hole. It will stop extremists from using bankruptcy laws to avoid any financial responsibility for the damages they have caused."

There are several examples of why this amendment is vital. The first is Randall Terry who has just filed for bankruptcy to discharge judgments he has been assessed for violence against women's health clinics. Randall Terry, former leader of Operation Rescue, has been sued and found libel for hundreds of thousands of dollars by several individuals and organizations for his activities against women and women's health clinics. Terry filed for bankruptcy explicitly to avoid paying these judgments.

In addition, Terry entered a settlement agreement in NOW v. Scheidler, wherein he agreed to not use force and violence against women's health clinics. He agreed to pay $15,000 for each breach of that agreement. Without this amendment, Terry will be able to violate this agreement - and flaunt our judicial system - with impunity.

Media Resources: Feminist Majority Foundation Press Release


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .