Scalia Defends Parallel Between Homosexuality and Murder
United State Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia defended his controversial stance on gay rights by comparing homosexuality to murder while speaking at Princeton University on Monday.
Associate Justice Scalia was speaking at a lecture at Princeton to promote his new book. Self-identified gay first year student, Duncan Hoise, asked Scalia about his dissenting opinion in the 1993 case Lawrence v Texas in which Scalia compared having morals against homosexuality to having morals against murder or bestiality.
"If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things?" Scalia questioned. "It's a form of argument that I thought you would have known, which is called the 'reduction to the absurd.' ...I don't think it's necessary but I think it's effective," he explained. Scalia concluded "I'm surprised you aren't persuaded."
Scalia's remarks come just a few days after the Supreme Court announced that it will see a case regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Proposition 8 next year. Though official dates have not been determined, hearings on the cases will most likely begin in late March with a ruling expected sometime in June.
Media Resources: CBS 12/10/12; The Daily Princetonian 12/10/12; Huffington Post 12/10/12; Feminist Newswire 12/7/12
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .