The Pennsylvania Department of Health announced this week that 14 abortion clinics across the state have been given a reprieve from compliance with Amendment 122, a Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) law. The amendment, passed in December 2011, went into effect yesterday. Under the law, clinics must comply with strict ambulatory surgical facility regulations which could potentially shut down all 22 clinics in the state. According to Essential Public Radio, one clinic has already closed, and eight are restricting services because they are unable to afford to comply with the mandated changes.
As reported in the York Daily Record, clinics have had to renovate buildings, buy new equipment, and re-train staff at high costs. In an interview with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania CEO Kimberlee Evert said of the changes, "Planned Parenthood Western Pennsylvania's doors are open today and they will be open tomorrow. Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our patients. Even in the face of burdensome, medically unnecessary regulations, we will do what it takes to be there for the women counting on us."
Clinics were awarded either a three or six month reprieve from compliance, depending upon the classification of the clinic. Under the law, Class A clinics perform surgeries with local anesthetic, while Class B clinics perform surgeries with stronger anesthesia. According to the Guttmacher Institute, TRAP laws were introduced in 19 states in 2011 and in 14 states in 2012. As reported by the Feminist Daily Newswire, TRAP laws in Virginia were voted on last week.
Media Resources: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 6/19/2012; York Daily Record 6/18/2012; Allentown Morning Call 6/18/2012; Essential Public Radio 6/19/2012; Feminist Daily Newswire 6/18/2012
10/13/2015 EEOC Launches Hollywood Gender Discrimination Probe - The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has contacted several women directors in Hollywood in an effort to determine whether legal intervention is necessary to disrupt the industry's discriminatory hiring practices.
In a letter sent to some 50 women filmmakers, the EEOC - which is responsible for protecting individuals from employment discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion and national origin through enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - requested interviews with them to "learn more about the gender-related issues" women behind the camera face in both the film and television industries.
In May, following the release of a study by the San Diego State University Center for the Study of Women in Television in Film revealing only 7 percent of 2014's 250 top-grossing movies were helmed by women, the ACLU of Southern California and the national ACLU Women's Rights Project urged state and federal rights agencies to investigate Hollywood's failure to hire equal numbers of women. . . .
10/12/2015 Report Finds Texas' HB2 Increases Abortion Wait Times - A new report released by the University of Texas at Austin, Texas Policy Evaluation Project found patients seeking abortions in Texas have experienced an increase in wait times since the passage of HB2, the 2013 Texas omnibus anti-abortion bill that attempts to cut off abortion access by requiring abortion providers in the state to fulfill medically unnecessary ambulatory surgical center requirements and secure hospital admitting privileges.
More than half of 42 clinics providing abortion in Texas have been forced to shut their doors since HB2 passed two years ago, leading Texas women to wait up to 20 days for a first consult at one of the surviving 18 reproductive health clinics operating in the state, the second most populous in the nation. . . .
10/9/2015 Federal Judge Orders Anti-Abortion Group to Cede Footage to NAF - On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and its leader David Daleidan must turn over all previously unreleased "sting" videos and outtakes of National Abortion Federation (NAF) meetings the group obtained surreptitiously as part of a smear campaign against the abortion provider.
U.S. . . .