The state of Connecticut declared abortion an "essential health benefit" last week and, as a result, the procedure must be covered by the state's health exchange under the Affordable Care Act. A state health panel voted unanimously to consider all abortions - not just abortions in cases of rape, incest, or to save the woman's life - essential health benefits that must be covered by Connecticut's insurance plans when the state's health exchange goes into effect in 2014.
Jennifer Jaff, executive director of Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness and a member of the advisory committee that is setting up the insurance exchange, praised the decision, saying "this issue is favorably resolved for all women now in Connecticut. Stripping women of elective abortions is not a tenable option." Victoria Vetri, Connecticut's healthcare advocate, said that the decision is "a matter of health. We wanted to protect a woman's right to choose."
Private insurance plans in Connecticut already cover abortion for any reason, Vetri told Connecticut Mirror. Under the Affordable Care Act, health plans across the country will be required by 2014 to cover certain essential health benefits, as determined by each state individually. Businesses and individuals have the option of purchasing the state's plan. The federal employees' health plan does not include coverage for abortions.
Media Resources: ThinkProgress 6/11/12; Care2 6/11/12; The Connecticut Mirror 6/8/12
7/1/2015 Women's Rights Activists are Suing the Kenyan Government for Reproductive Rights - A woman in Kenya is suing the Kenyan government for failure to provide safe and legal abortions, which caused her daughter - a 15-year-old rape victim - to suffer a kidney failure after undergoing the procedure illegally.
Currently, there are four petitioners on the case: the mother of the survivor, the Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya, and two other women's rights advocates. . . .
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature.
This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts.
In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .