House Judiciary Committee Passes Cantor/Adams Version of VAWA Reauthorization Bill
The House Judiciary Committee passed the Cantor/Adams VAWA Reauthorization bill in a nearly straight party line vote yesterday. Only one Republican, Ted Poe (TX-2), joined the Democrats in voting no. The Committee, in denying consideration of the substitute bill of Ranking Member John Conyers (D-MI), essentially rejected what Vice President Biden (the principal author of the original VAWA) called the "real McCoy" VAWA Reauthorization which passed the Senate with a bipartisan 68-31 vote in late April. 2012 marks the first time that both Senate and House Committee votes on VAWA have been essentially party line.
The Cantor/Adams bill is particularly cruel to immigrant women survivors of violence because it eliminates their confidentiality in reporting by requiring immigration officials to interview the abuser and tell him about the complaint. Moreover, the bill guts the U visa process which enables survivors to stay in the US while the legal process against the abuser is being pursued. It also is harsh to Native American women when they are abused by non-Native Americans on tribal lands. It does not give Native American authorities the power to prosecute these non-Native abusers. More than 50 percent of Native women have non-Native spouses. Finally, the Cantor/Adams bill denies LGBT survivors support necessary for victims of domestic violence.
Before the Cantor/Adams bill, VAWA Reauthorization legislation - ever since it first passed in 1994 - has always expanded coverage and services for the purpose of reducing violence. This is the first time a VAWA bill has been approved that narrows or restricts protections.
Media Resources: Feminist Majority Press Release 5/8/2012
11/20/2014 Federal Appeals Court Rejects Priests for Life Challenge to Birth Control Coverage Rule - In a victory for women's health, a unanimous panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit on Friday rejected a challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) contraceptive coverage benefit brought by Priests for Life, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington and other religiously affiliated non-profit organizations.
Judge Nina Pillard, a former law professor who was nominated to the DC Circuit by President Obama and confirmed by the Senate in December, wrote the opinion for the Court, which found that the ACA birth control benefit did not substantially burden or violate non-profits' religious freedom.
Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurance companies must cover the full cost of all FDA-approved contraceptives - including the pill, IUDs, and emergency contraception - without requiring co-pays or cost-sharing. . . .