Supreme Court Reaffirms Separation of Church and State in School Prayer Case
The Supreme Court today ruled against
student-led prayers at high school football
games, reaffirming earlier decisions against
"officially sponsored prayer in public schools."
The decision declared unconstitutional a
Santa Fe public school district's policy to
elect students to lead prayer before home
high school football games. The 6-3 majority
opinion was written by Justice John Paul
Stevens, who noted that, despite the school
district's argument that the prayers were
student-led and voluntary, "the delivery of a
pre-game prayer has the improper effect of
coercing those present to participate in an act
of religious worship." Chief Justice Rehnquist
wrote a dissenting opinion, which was signed
by Justices Scalia and Thomas.
The New York Times reported today on
some important aspects of the case, which
was initiated by a Roman Catholic and a
Mormon family. For example, while the
school district argued that the prayers were
"private speech," and did not violate the
separation of Church and state; the Supreme
Court held that "the realities of the situation
plainly reveal that its policy involves both
perceived and actual endorsement of
religion." In a related case, the Court let stand
a ban on a Louisiana school board policy
requiring teachers to preface the teaching of
evolution with a disclaimer that the theory was
"not intended to influence or dissuade the
biblical version of creation or any other
concept." Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas also
dissented from that decision. .
Media Resources: The New York Times- 20 June 2000 and Washington
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .