Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

October-19-10

OH Elections Commission Rules Against SBA List in False Advertising Complaint

Late last week, the Ohio Elections Commission ruled that US Representative Steve Driehaus (D-OH) can proceed with his complaint that the Susan B Anthony List, an anti-abortion group, is intentionally lying to distort his record. According to CNN, Driehaus seeks to prevent the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) from erecting four billboards claiming that he supports federally funded abortions because he voted for the national health care reform bill.

The ruling establishes that there will be another hearing in order to determine whether the SBA List has violated Ohio law. If the SBA List is found to be in violation of campaign law, which prohibits groups from making false statements in campaigns, it may face a public reprimand or prosecution resulting in fines or jail time, reports the Cincinnati Enquirer.

The Cincinnati Enquirer reports that the health care reform bill has been attacked by every major pro-life group in the country for its allowance of taxpayer-funded abortion services. However, Driehaus has been quick to emphasize that the health care bill does not introduce any new federal funding for abortion, since the 1970 Hyde Amendment permits government-funded abortions in situations of rape, incest, or to save the mother's life. CNN notes that the bill also states that abortion services must be covered by private premiums, even in government subsidized healthcare exchanges.

According to CNN, the SBA List has been specifically targeting pro-life Democrats who voted for the health care reform bill. The group has strongly condemned the Ohio Election Commission's ruling. SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser told the Cincinnati Enquirer that the Commission has enabled Driehaus "to achieve his strategic objective of preventing constituents from learning the truth about his vote in favor of taxpayer funding of abortion." She continued, "We will use every vehicle possible within our First Amendment rights to communicate this message to the people of...Driehaus' district between now and the hearing."

Media Resources: CNN 10/15/10; Cincinnati Enquirer 10/14/10


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/20/2014 North Carolina Board of Elections Eliminates On-Campus Voting Sites Across the State - North Carolina will begin state-wide early voting on Thursday, and unlike the 2012 presidential election, many students across the state will have no polling place on-campus, making it more difficult for students to exercise their right to vote. The North Carolina State Board of Elections recently eliminated the only on-campus voting location for the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, a campus with more than 20,000 students. . . .
 
10/20/2014 Jay Leno Receives Mark Twain Prize, Salutes Mavis and Her Work for Women's Rights - Former long-time host of "The Tonight Show" Jay Leno saluted his wife, Mavis, for her work on behalf of women's rights around the world when he was awarded the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor this weekend at The Kennedy Center in Washington, DC. The Mark Twain prize is awarded for comedic achievement, and the event, where Leno performed a monologue and paid tribute to the many comedians he has worked with throughout his career, brought together supporters of the The John F. . . .
 
10/20/2014 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Slams Supreme Court for Upholding Voter Suppression in Texas - Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a blistering dissent after a ruling by the US Supreme Court this weekend threatened to disqualify more than half a million Texas voters from early voting. In an unsigned order Saturday, a majority of the Supreme Court sided with a Texas law requiring voters to produce specific forms of photo identification in order to cast a ballot in the 2014 election. . . .