Women's Groups Fear Possibility of "Another Taliban" in Pakistan
Women's rights groups in Pakistan fear that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's plans to "Islamize" the country's government will devastate women there.
Pakistani women already face pervasive domestic abuse and discrimination. Shahnaz Bokhari of the Progressive Women's Association believes that Sharif's plan will devastate gains made in women's rights by institutionalizing women's status as invisible and inferior and asked "Will this lead us to another Taliban?"
Bokhari reported that hundreds of Pakistani women are burned or mutilated by their husbands and that if the government imposes sharia, the abuse will increase. Fatima Mernissi defines sharia as sacred law based on the Koran and Sunna (teachings of the Prophet Muhammad), which represents or expresses divine will1. "If sharia is imposed, how can they say women will be safe? At home, behind a veil, where they can be burned or killed with no recourse?" asked Bokhari.
The government denies any attempt to emulate the Taliban and states that its objective is to rid Pakistani society of "barbarity and lawlessness."
Critics of the government charge Sharif's plan to "Islamize" Pakistan is unnecessary because the government's constitution already clearly establishes Pakistan's adherence to Islam. Aitzaz Ahsan, opposition leader in the National Assembly, said that Sharif's plan would allow him to rule as a dictator, issuing orders that legislators and courts would have no power to refuse. "This is designed very nakedly to concentrate all authority and power in the prime minister's office. It would make him a supra-constitutional monster," said Ahsan.
1Mernissi, Fatima (1991). The veil and the male elite. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, p. 32.
Media Resources: Washington Post - September 2, 1998
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .