College Campuses Not Meeting Requirements to Report Sexual Assault
A new report released this week on sexual assault on college campuses found that many US colleges and universities routinely fail to uphold established legal obligations to survivors of sexual assault. The report examined archival evidence from the past 10 years and found that the omissions of higher educational institutions ultimately are barriers that insulate perpetrators of sexual assault from prosecution and punishment.
The report found that College Campuses regularly flout their legal obligations under Title IX and the Clery Act. Title IX, the revolutionary federal law that outlaws sex-discrimination in education, was originally passed in 1972, and reads: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." The report found various cases of School administrators and school police ignoring victims' reports of sexual assault instead of initiating investigations, in violation of Title IX.
The Clery Act, requires that four-year higher educational institutions where federal financial aid is available to students, collect, preserve, and disclose crime information when the incidents occur on or near campus. In violation of the Clery Act, one section of the report found that many colleges report no incidents of rape despite contradicting reports from associated victim response groups. Additionally, 77 percent of four-year colleges and universities reported no incidents of sexual assault or harassment in 2006. This figure conflicts with federal estimates that, during college, 1 in 5 women will become a victim of attempted rape or rape. However, it is also estimated that 95 percent of rape cases will not be reported.
Media Resources: Center for Public Integrity 12/1/09, 12/2/09, 12/3/09; Center for Public Integrity Clery Act Fact Sheet; Feminist Daily Newswire 10/20/09
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .