Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

December-15-98

Statement of Eleanor Smeal, President of Feminist Majority on the Pending Presidential Impeachment Vote

The Feminist Majority joins with our sister organizations - and indeed the majority of women in this nation - in a united call to action to help stop this impeachment spectacle that has overtaken our political system. We stand today in disbelief that Congress is about to impeach a president who has the support of two-thirds of the American people - support which was voiced loud and clear on Election Day.

If you believe that the impeachment process must stop - call your member of Congress and your Senators at 202-225-3121. And call Speaker-elect Bob Livingston to urge him to allow a vote on censure. The Feminist Majority will join other women's groups, civil rights groups, and labor organizations in a vigil outside of the House of Representatives on Thursday from 10am to 2pm.

Women leaders felt so strongly that this mockery of justice must come to an end that on September 24 - before the elections - we issued the first public call to action to stop the impeachment process. Now, we come together again in an effort to end this partisan travesty before it is too late.

We should not be lulled into complacency by the assumption that the U.S. Senate ultimately will be able to put a stop to this madness. A Senate trial will paralyze this nation. It would irreparably weaken the position of the office of the president and the global standing of the United States. It would bring to a standstill our chances of passing the Violence Against Women Act II and the Fair Pay Act, strengthening Social Security for women, and raising the minimum wage.

Assume the worst - are these offenses crimes against the state - can we equate this misconduct - especially abhorrent to feminist leaders - with treason and bribery and abuse of presidential power? Of course not. We must keep some sense of proportionality. Precisely because of the sexual backdrop of this misconduct some of us felt compelled and duty-bound to speak out and to act.

Women have an unique role to play in the process. We have disproportionately supported the President because of his record on the issues. We deplore his misconduct, but we also understand the hypocrisy of his opponents.

The self-righteous right wing opponents of sexual harassment law in their self-appointed role as sex police are distorting the concept of sexual harassment into a tool of selective prosecution. How ironic it is that the chair of the House Judiciary Committee who himself lived a double life will be the prosecutor in a Senate trial.

The irony continues. Elections in which the majority of women voted for the President and his policies are about to be declared null and void by a Congress which is comprised of only 12% women.

From the beginning, there has been a gender gap in the public opinion polls in President Clinton's approval rating, with women supporting President Clinton most strongly. Throughout this scandal, women have maintained their strong support for the President. Today, President Clinton's approval rating is so high because the gender gap is closing with men moving in the direction that women initially staked out. In the November elections, exit polls revealed overwhelming opposition to impeachment. And social security and education mattered far more to voters than the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. Yet Congress is on the brink of taking irrevocable actions which fly in the face of public opinion -- and of women's opinion.

The President has sustained support from among women not only because of his record on issues that matter to women but also because of the record of his political opponents. Moreover, some of those who attack the President for immoral sexual behavior could not themselves stand the same public scrutiny. The public, and women most of all understand, this hypocrisy.

Media Resources: Feminist Majority - December 15, 1998


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .