California Supreme Court Rules on Religiously Biased Healthcare
The California Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that doctors cannot withhold care from gay and lesbian patients on the basis of religious belief. The court ruled that "although religious liberty was protected by the constitution, this was not an excuse for unlawful discrimination against others," according to BBC News.
The ruling resulted from a lawsuit originally filed in 2001 against the North Coast Women's Care Medical Group by Guadalupe Benitez. Benitez, who is a lesbian, hoped to become pregnant via artificial insemination at North Coast, the only fertility provider covered by her insurance. Her doctor at North Coast refused to perform artificial insemination due to religious objections to Benitez's sexual orientation. Benitez sued under a state civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation by businesses.
In relation to the lawsuit, Benitez told Ms. magazine that "I couldn't stop [fighting], not only for myself and my family [but] for all the people who come after me. [Doctors] shouldn't have the power to decide who should be able to have children."
Media Resources: BBC News 8/19/08; HRC "Equally Speaking 8/19/08; Ms. Fall 2006
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .