Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

April-24-08

House Committee Holds Hearings on Failed Abstinence-Only Policy

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing on Wednesday to assess the effectiveness of abstinence-only programs in the US. The Washington Times reports that for years, researchers have urged Congress to get rid of abstinence-only programs because studies have shown that they are ineffective and potentially harmful to teens. Senator Sam Brownback and Representative Lois Capps were scheduled to testify along with representatives from the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Health and Human Services, public health specialists, and researchers. funny pictures funny images funny photos funny animal pictures funny dog pictures funny cat pictures funny gifs

Vania Leveille, legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Washington Legislative Office, told ACLU, "The evidence leads to only one conclusion: abstinence-only programs represent a failed policy. They are driven by ideology and politics, rather than by science or good public health policy, and our young people are suffering as a result. Most troubling, they represent a purposeful campaign to mislead, distort, stifle and censor, and are part of a disturbing trend to politicize science. The ACLU urges congressional action to bring this failed policy to an end."

Dr. John Santelli testified at the hearing about the failure of abstinence-only programs. His testimony underlines the importance of comprehensive sexuality education programs to delay sexual initiation and inform teens about sexual health. Abstinence-only programs are proven to withhold information or include misinformation about reproductive health, especially contraceptive use. This is more alarming given the high rates of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases among teens in the US.

Reuters reports that abstinence-only programs have received $1.3 billion in federal funds since the late 1990s. Seventeen states currently refuse federal funding for abstinence-only programs.

Media Resources: ACLU 04/23/08; RH Reality Check 04/22/08; Washington Times 04/23/08; Reuters 04/23/08; Feminist Newswire 02/29/08


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

7/1/2015 Women's Rights Activists are Suing the Kenyan Government for Reproductive Rights - A woman in Kenya is suing the Kenyan government for failure to provide safe and legal abortions, which caused her daughter - a 15-year-old rape victim - to suffer a kidney failure after undergoing the procedure illegally. Currently, there are four petitioners on the case: the mother of the survivor, the Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya, and two other women's rights advocates. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Community Members, Advocates, and Celebrities Stand in Support with Bree Newsome - On June 27, at about 6:30 AM, Bree Newsome scaled the flagpole at South Carolina's Statehouse and removed the confederate flag. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature. This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts. In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .