The California State Senate has passed a law to shield workers in the state from a US Supreme Court decision that severely limits employees' ability to sue for equal pay. In May, the Court ruled 5-4 in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire Co. that wage discrimination complaints could only be filed within 180 days of the initial discriminatory salary decision. The California fix specifies that the time period for filing a complaint restarts with each discriminatory paycheck.
"The Courtís decision ignores the reality of the workplace where salaries are often hidden ... [It] encourages employers to hide information and will likely lead to more unlawful discrimination," said California Assemblymember Dave Jones (D-Sacramento), the bill's sponsor. "This legislation will ensure that the Supreme Courtís flawed decision does not apply to state laws that affect a worker's right to equal pay."
The bill makes California the first state to introduce its own version of the federal Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, a bipartisan bill to clarify federal discrimination law in the wake of Ledbetter. The Act passed the House in July and awaits approval in the Senate, where it is titled The Fair Pay Restoration Act.
The California bill must still pass the State Assembly and be signed by the governor. It has the support of women's rights, civil rights, and labor groups but faces opposition from the state Chamber of Commerce.
Media Resources: Assemblymember Dave Jones Press Release 9/7/07; Washington Post 8/14/07; Feminist Daily Wire 7/25/07
10/21/2014 Afghanistan's New First Lady Advances Women's Issues - Just a few days after moving to the presidential palace, Afghanistan's new First Lady Rula Ghani said that she hopes to encourage greater respect for women.
Rula Ghani already broke tradition by participating in her husband, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai's, campaign for President. . . .
10/21/2014 Hulu Silences Rape Survivor Speaking Out Against Anti-Abortion Amendment 67 in Colorado - Hulu, an online, ad-supported streaming service, has refused to run an advertisement from the "No on 67" campaign in Colorado, citing the company's policy regarding "controversial" political positions on issues like abortion.
In a letter to the CEO of Hulu, dated October 10, the Vote No on 67 Campaign, which is supported by the Feminist Majority Foundation, asked the company to reconsider its unwillingness to air a 35-second spot featuring a rape survivor's testimony about the far-reaching impact of Colorado's proposed Amendment 67. . . .