Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

April-17-07

Non-Prescription Plan B Challenged in Lawsuit

Conservative groups have filed a federal suit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in an attempt to overturn approval of Plan B, the "morning-after pill," for non-prescription sale to women 18 and older. The plaintiffs, who include Concerned Women for America and the Family Research Council, say that the FDA approved non-prescription Plan B under "unlawful political pressure" from Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA).

Plan B, a brand of emergency contraception that prevents pregnancy when taken within 120 hours of unprotected sex, was approved for non-prescription sale after Clinton and Murray in August 2006 placed a hold on the nomination of a new FDA head pending a Plan B decision. The senators did not specify a particular outcome, only urging that the FDA issue a decision on the drug. They acted after the FDA had postponed making a decision on non-prescription Plan B for over three years (such decisions usually take less than a year) despite the fact that two FDA expert advisory panels early on voted 27-1 that Plan B was safe for all ages and 23-4 in favor of non-prescription use, and despite the drug's overwhelming endorsement from national medical groups.

Many have blamed the FDA's years of delay on the Bush administrationís political interference. Dr. Susan Wood, who resigned from her post as director of the FDA's Office of Women's Health over the Plan B delay, said in a 2005 interview, "The agency was not acting independently. The leadership of the FDA overruled every level of staff review in the agency." The agency's head is appointed by the president.

The suit additionally charges that the FDA did not have the authority to create a new class of drug that does not require a prescription for women over 18, must be dispensed by a pharmacist, and requires a dual label for the over- and under-18 markets. These age and label restrictions were imposed by Bush-appointed FDA acting commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach and were met with frustration by reproductive-rights groups.

The lawsuit also erroneously claims that over-the-counter Plan B "causes an increase in the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases" and calls it "a dangerous drug."

"It's ridiculous to label as a 'dangerous drug' something that has been proven safer than aspirin, and it's ridiculous to withhold this medical breakthrough from women," says Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation. "The irony is that some of the very people now claiming political interference are those who -- for more than three years -- used politics to trump good medical science."

Media Resources: Civil Action Lawsuit No. 07: 0668-RCL 4/12/07; Family Research Council 4/13/07; NPR.org 8/28/06; NYT 8/24/06; Nerve.com 10/16/05; FMF; Guttmacher Institute; Washington Times 4/13/07


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/29/2014 Terry O'Neill Was One of Hundreds Arrested Calling for Immigration Reform at White House Rally - Thursday, nearly 300 people were arrested in front of the White House during a rally calling on President Barack Obama to halt mass deportations. . . .
 
8/29/2014 BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Blocks Texas TRAP Law Provision! - WASHINGTON - The Feminist Majority Foundation applauds U.S. . . .
 
8/29/2014 Domestic Violence Victims May Now Qualify For Asylum in the US - A recent case has opened the door for victims of domestic violence abroad to qualify for asylum in the United States. The Justice Department's Board of Immigration Appeals ruled for the first time on Tuesday that a victim of domestic violence fit a specific criterion for asylum: persecution for membership in a particular social group. . . .