Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

July-01-13

Texas Second Special Session Begins

Texas Lawmakers return for a second special session today to discuss an anti-abortion bill after last week's fight to save the majority of clinics in the state.

Last Wednesday, Democratic Senator Wendy Davis (Fort Worth) stood for 12 hours in a filibuster to kill bill Senate Bill 5. Supporters of the bill tried to derail Davis by citing procedural rules that Davis allegedly violated, bringing the bill to the floor for a vote. But the outcries of told ABC's "This Week on Sunday," "I am an eternal optimist. I believe in people; I believe in the power of democracy, and I am going to fight with every fiber I have to keep it from passing." She and other opponents of the bill have pledged to continue to fight the bill during this second session.

Supporters of the bill have already said that they will bring the bill to floor early so there is no threat of running out of time. However, protests against the bill began online as soon as the second session was announced. Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, told reporters, "A fuse has been lit in Austin, and there is growing opposition across the state to these attacks that endanger women's health and safety."

According to Dallas News, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst (R) said "We are going to get it back from the house within filibuster range, we are going to make sure that we have got plenty of time, and no human being can talk for two weeks." Davis countered , saying "If leaders intend to keep pushing their extreme personal political agenda ahead of the interests to Texas families, I will not back off of my duty to fight on their behalf."

The measure, formerly Senate Bill 5, now Senate Bill 9, would outlaw abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy and require abortions clinics to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers, even if only nonsurgical procedures, or medication abortions, are being done. It would also require the doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic. If passed, the bill threatens to close 37 out of the 42 abortion clinics in the state of Texas.

Media Resources: Sources: Reuters 7/1/2013; Washington Post 7/1/2013; Dallas News 6/30/2013; Feminist Newswire 6/27/20213


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/29/2014 North Dakota Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Restrictions - The North Dakota Supreme Court yesterday upheld a set of misguided restrictions on medication abortion, allowing what is effectively a ban on early, non-surgical abortions in the state to go into effect immediately. The decision overturned a lower court order finding the law, known as HB 1297, unconstitutional and permanently blocking its enforcement. . . .