Decision Expected Soon on Broadening Religious Exemption for Contraceptive Coverage
A decision by the Obama Administration is expected soon, possibly before Thanksgiving, on broadening the religious exemption for contraceptive coverage. Women's rights and pro-choice groups, including the Feminist Majority Foundation, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the National Women's Law Center, the National Council of Jewish Women, the National Organization for Women (NOW), and NARAL Pro-Choice America, have joined together to urge the Obama Administration not to consider broader religious exemptions under the Affordable Care Act which requires health insurance providers under the preventive care package to cover contraceptives without co-pays.
The Catholic Bishops want to exempt the health insurance of every religiously-connected or associated institution from this requirement, affecting millions of Americans. Those affected would include students, teachers and staff at religiously-connected or associated schools and universities; social workers, nurses, and other staff (and their families) at religiously-affiliated hospitals; federally-funded social service organizations like Catholic Charities.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, issued a narrow religious exemption, which the Administration is considering broadening. This religious exemption is applicable to "not-for-profit groups that have the inculcation of religious values as their purpose, primarily employ individuals who hold certain religious beliefs and primarily serve a population with those tenants." It is interpreted that this religious exemption would only cover employees of the religious institutions themselves, such as employees of churches, synagogues, or mosques.
Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) spoke out against expanding the exemption, stating, "There is not a scintilla of legislative direction in the statute that requires the broadened exemption that the administration is contemplating." Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) added, "It just doesn't make sense to take this benefit away from millions of women. Americans of all religious faiths overwhelmingly support broad access to birth control."
This coverage of birth control without co-pays under the preventive care package of the Affordable Care Act was recommended by the non-partisan Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. Moreover, voters overwhelmingly supported this requirement, including 77 percent of Catholic women. Women's rights groups are determined to protect women's access to birth control without co-pays.
Media Resources: National Partnership for Women and Families 11/21/11; NARAL Pro-Choice America 11/21/11; Planned Parenthood Action Fund 11/21/11; New York Times 11/19/11; Feminist Majority Foundation Email 11/17/11
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .