Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

November-21-11

Decision Expected Soon on Broadening Religious Exemption for Contraceptive Coverage

A decision by the Obama Administration is expected soon, possibly before Thanksgiving, on broadening the religious exemption for contraceptive coverage. Women's rights and pro-choice groups, including the Feminist Majority Foundation, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the National Women's Law Center, the National Council of Jewish Women, the National Organization for Women (NOW), and NARAL Pro-Choice America, have joined together to urge the Obama Administration not to consider broader religious exemptions under the Affordable Care Act which requires health insurance providers under the preventive care package to cover contraceptives without co-pays.

The Catholic Bishops want to exempt the health insurance of every religiously-connected or associated institution from this requirement, affecting millions of Americans. Those affected would include students, teachers and staff at religiously-connected or associated schools and universities; social workers, nurses, and other staff (and their families) at religiously-affiliated hospitals; federally-funded social service organizations like Catholic Charities.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), under Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, issued a narrow religious exemption, which the Administration is considering broadening. This religious exemption is applicable to "not-for-profit groups that have the inculcation of religious values as their purpose, primarily employ individuals who hold certain religious beliefs and primarily serve a population with those tenants." It is interpreted that this religious exemption would only cover employees of the religious institutions themselves, such as employees of churches, synagogues, or mosques.

Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) spoke out against expanding the exemption, stating, "There is not a scintilla of legislative direction in the statute that requires the broadened exemption that the administration is contemplating." Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) added, "It just doesn't make sense to take this benefit away from millions of women. Americans of all religious faiths overwhelmingly support broad access to birth control."

This coverage of birth control without co-pays under the preventive care package of the Affordable Care Act was recommended by the non-partisan Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. Moreover, voters overwhelmingly supported this requirement, including 77 percent of Catholic women. Women's rights groups are determined to protect women's access to birth control without co-pays.

Media Resources: National Partnership for Women and Families 11/21/11; NARAL Pro-Choice America 11/21/11; Planned Parenthood Action Fund 11/21/11; New York Times 11/19/11; Feminist Majority Foundation Email 11/17/11


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska. The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services. The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge. Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska. "By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read. "We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
 
8/27/2015 Los Angeles Mayor Announces Model Gender Equity Directive - On Women's Equality Day Eric Garcetti, the Mayor of Los Angeles, signed a progressive and inclusive executive directive to take a major step toward gender equity for the city and to be a model for other cities. . . .
 
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections. This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .