Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

April-01-10

Nebraska Abortion Restriction Bill Advances

Nebraska's Senate voted 38 to 5 on an abortion bill which will affect how long into a pregnancy abortion is legal, based on the fetus's possible ability to feel pain. According to the Omaha World-Herald, Nebraska's current abortion law was based on fetal viability, which begins around 24 weeks after fertilization.

The current bill was introduced in the Nebraska state Legislature in January by Speaker Mike Flood (R). Under the bill, abortions after the 20th week would only be permissible "to avert death or to avert serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function." The bill also cites "substantial evidence that abortion methods used at and after 20 weeks would cause substantial pain to an unborn child" as the reason for the ban.

Flood decided to introduce the bill after Dr. Leroy Carhart, a Nebraska abortion provider, announced his intention to continue the work of Dr. George Tiller last summer. Dr. Carhart was a close friend and colleague of Dr. George Tiller, who was murdered in May 2009 at his church. Dr. Tiller was one of the few late abortion providers in the country. Prior to the murder, Dr. Carhart provided late abortions at Tiller's clinic, Women's Health Care Services, in Wichita, Kansas.

State Senator Danielle Conrad, who voted against the bill, told KPTM News, "This bill isn't about fetal pain, it's about pushing the envelope to get rid of women's rights." Senator Brenda Council also told KPTM News that the bill is "advancing political agendas above the real interests of women and children in this state," and labeled it as "a total disregard for the interests of the mothers and families who have to make difficult decisions."

Of the 2,800 abortions performed in Nebraska in 2008, none were performed after 20 weeks, bringing up questions about the need for such legislation. The bill will now face two more rounds of debate and two more votes before it can be sent to the governor's office for approval.

Media Resources: Omaha World-Herald 3/31/10; Feminist Daily Newswire 3/1/10; KPTM News 3/31/10; Nebraska LB1103


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .