Another part of the dilemma is that it is difficult to credit the idea of substantially improving the lives of women in pornography or prostitution, because of the nature of the beast. To me, the obvious way to improve their lives is to help them get out, but it appears that is a minor focus for your "side." However, I would agree that throwing prostitutes in jail is not at all helpful, for them or society.

And, is every webhoster listed on WordPress affiliated with religious fundamentalsts? Did Dines and her friends even attempt a background check, via Google if nothing else?

Of course ‘sex-negative’ fits you. Your defensiveness is reminiscent of het folks who oppose gay marriage but claim that they are not homophobes because they ‘hate the sin, love the sinner.’

I’m with you, if that is a woman’s choice.

I raise this issue here that I raised in a comment on Part II: Why won’t people from your “side” work with us when it comes to improving the lives of people in pornography, which obviously includes better assistance when trying to transition out of the industry?

By the way, do you actually think “sex-negative” fits me? I cannot speak for Gail Dines, but really, that description is completely absurd. But it fits in with the kind of reversal I have learned to expect in this arena of the “sex” wars. That is another misnomer; the wars have been about pornography, not sex.

I should have been more specific in my reference to “a right to a way out.” To me that implies a right to assistance, for instance vocational, educational, emotional rehabilitation, to develop a skill or talent that would enable a woman to find a better way to make a living.

Sex-positive feminists give as good as they get. They are not like those timid Democrats scared by Fox News into axing Shirley Sherrod.

Inasmuch as Dines and Stop Porn Culture claim to be so high-falutin’ and radical in their feminism, their hypocrisy needs to be exposed, regardless of Aletha’s “WordPress-made-me-do-it” defense.